image 12

[BINGO]

I'll take a shot.

I understood the statement. I missed when and where JJP indicated that no data was lost in printing.

Does this mean there is a group of beautifuller people amongst the group of beautiful people?

[renovator]

Just trying to validate the comment.

Good luck with that. JJP isn't talking. Whomever he told directly isn't talking. And Matt, who presumably got the information secondhand didn't say either. Honestly, my speculation above is probably more reliable.

[BINGO]

Nah, you are confused. Just trying to validate the comment.

Not confused, just poking fun at a user who I think has the ability to handle a little light-hearted ball kick every so often.

[Choice]

Got ball fetish BINGO?!

[maltedfalcon]

So to be clear JJP has indicated that no data was lost in the printing

Can you expand upon this, please? Regardless of if we agree with what would be considered difficult, this is interesting.

yes- I made it a point of saying in the process of printing data/colors were lost that made the bubbles impossible to solve so why bother.
I was told JJP said nothing was lost in the printing. I am not sure if this was in an EU outtake or from Podcast research, and at this point I am not sure who told me this.
it was during prep for a podcast.

[Kang]

Can you expand upon this, please?

...Having access to the original painting (and what he was told by BP when he made it), and having access to the re-print in the book, JJP has concluded that one can still deduce the information that those panels were meant to convey, if any...

So to be clear JJP has indicated that no data was lost in the printing

Can you expand upon this, please? Regardless of if we agree with what would be considered difficult, this is interesting.

yes- I made it a point of saying in the process of printing data/colors were lost that made the bubbles impossible to solve so why bother.
I was told JJP said nothing was lost in the printing.

MaltedFalcon and Renovator - just to clarify as to make sure there are no misunderstandings - Ren when you use the word "re-print" I assume you're referring to when the original paintings were re-printed into the ORIGINAL printing of the book (1982). And Falcon - I assume you're referring to same?
(And that neither of you are referring to the images in the re-print OF the book (2015). Can you confirm my assumptions (just so no one misunderstands)?

[four21thrasher]

MaltedFalcon and Renovator...

I thought V8 and Pittsburgh was bad...who'da thunk these two would ever be paired.

[Kang]

"On November 13th, Kang put two names into the same sentence that DO NOT go together. That mistake was entirely his bad..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYeAu71rHdE

who'da thunk these two would ever be paired.

[Choice]

Is there any significance to Manhattan map being in the domes except the location indicator?

[maltedfalcon]

thats not the problem
the problem is using the name "Maltedfalcon" in a sentence with the word re-print..., this I take great offense from
these are two words that should never be paired....
The re-print is an abomination and referring to it should be grounds for banning from q4t
dammit now I have to be banned. Phew! good thing there isn't any administrator presence around here.

[four21thrasher]

dammit now I have to be banned. Phew! good thing there isn't any administrator presence around here.

[four21thrasher]

[renovator]

Ren when you use the word "re-print"...

Yes Kang, my mistake. I should have used the word "reproduction" or "print in the original copy". But the Images in the original publication of the book, as opposed to the original artwork, is the distinction that I was trying to make.
And I don't mind having my handle and Matt's included in the same sentence. Between the two of us, we have a pretty extensive understanding of the puzzle.

[Choice]

I'm a big fan of Chi Rho. I post Chi Rho whenever possible. I'm a collector of Roman and Byzantine coins and the coins with XP reverse are the most popular and hardest to buy at reasonable price. In this context I'm on the fence. Anywho:
Have you pinpointed a dig spot Durian?
22 steps down the hill is a long area across to dig unless you think it's right next to the step?
Then the more part? If it's stairs then 22+ steps could be 23? Then why doesn't the clock show 11:30?
I also wish there was an image confirmer of the dig spot similar to the other solved spots.

[gManTexas]

I just realized I've been posting my NY puzzle thoughts on the South Brooklyn specific NY puzzle thread, so I'll move them here. Anybody in NY interested in helping me figure out if St. Peter (the "rock" of the church...whose name is from the Greek word "petra" for stone...who walks on water...is the patron saint of Peter the Great...and who Peter the Great named St. Petersburg after) is truly Him of Hard word, identified as the rock in 3 of the four gospels? I'm looking for someone in the NY area interested in scouting a particular location on Staten Island with a commanding view of the water: https://thesecretsfsolution.blogspot.co ... -york.html

Just read your blog entry, not bad. Someone has to go dig up a church yard though.